Binnen Brabant ook niet hoor. Met name publieke instellingen en grote bedrijven volgen de richtlijnen redelijk strikt, maar het mkb draait gewoon door. Helaas hebben heel veel mensen nog steeds een "het zal wel" instelling.
Heb je koorts (meer dan 38⁰ Celcius) en luchtwegklachten (zoals hoesten of kortademigheid) en heb je contact gehad met een patiënt met het coronavirus of ben je de afgelopen 14 dagen in een van de volgende gebieden geweest: China (inclusief: Macau en Hongkong)De Noord-Italiaanse provincies: Lombardije, Veneto, Emiglia Romagna, Piëmonte, Aosta-vallei, Trentino-Zuid-Tirol, Friuli-Julisch-Venetië en LiguriëIranSingaporeZuid-Korea Neem dan telefonisch contact op met je huisarts. Ben je in een van deze gebieden geweest en heb je alleen verkoudheidsklachten of verhoging, blijf dan thuis en zorg dat je zo min mogelijk contact met anderen hebt. Dit kunnen namelijk de eerste klachten zijn van COVID-19, maar het kan ook een verkoudheid zijn. Het is niet nodig om de huisarts te bellen. Worden de klachten erger en krijg je koorts en luchtwegklachten (hoesten en benauwd), bel dan de huisarts Hmm ik begrijo echt niet dat her advies na al die onbekende besmettingen nogsteeds zegt risicogebied of contact met corona patient. De website van rivm is veranderd ik kan de bolletjes niet meer vinden
Ik vind het eerlijk gezegd erg moeilijk. De oudste loopt ook te hoesten, maar welke kleuter nu niet? En je let er nu zooo goed op. En inderdaad iedereen thuis, maar en dan? Geen medisch personeel, geen toevoer nodige middelen...
Bedoel je deze website? https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/infectieziekten/regionaal-internationaal/coronavirus-covid-19#node-coronavirus-covid-19-meldingen
Ja dankje, ik kan er niet op drukken hmm nogsteeds staan de besmette mensen uit mijn regio er niet op, dat was vrijdag al bekend in het regionale nieuws, zullen die wel meegerekend zijn in de telling of lopen ze zo erg achter?
In de brief van de school van mijn dochter staat dus wel Noord Brabant als risico gebied erbij, dat scheelt. Mijn dochter zit trouwens op een brede cluster 3 school, met ook chronisch zieke kinderen, dus een nogal kwetsbare doelgroep. Ze is zelf al maanden op en af verkouden en ik ben dus nu blij dat we in de voorjaarsvakantie ook al ziek waren, want anders waren we naar mijn moeder geweest die precies midden in brabant woont en had ik nu wel erg getwijfeld. Nu is het bijna zeker gewoon een verkoudheid of het is al zo verspreid dat ze het op school heeft opgelopen, want verder nauwelijks contacten gehad de afgelopen weken.
Dank aan Amdaa voor het eerder al plaatsen! Met nu een nieuw topic en vast velen die deze eerste post hebben gemist, vond ik het toch belangrijk om dit artikel een tweede keer te plaatsen. Een voorbeeld met feitenlijke onderbouwing van kritiek in het buitenland op het beleid van RIVM/onze politiek. How Dutch false sense of security helped coronavirus spread Flawed advice that only those with symptoms can spread virus contributes to slow response Naomi O’Leary Europe Correspondent follow about 15 hours ago 19 The position of Dutch authorities was that only people with symptoms could transmit coronavirus. It was repeated by the government, national and local health authorities, justifying a cascade of decisions that allowed the Netherlands to keep up a “business as usual” attitude even as the virus exponentially spread. The problem was, it was wrong. As early as February 21st, Chinese doctors published a case of apparent asymptomatic transmission; German doctors wrote to the New England Journal of Medicine on March 5th to warn of a case near Munich. The World Health Organisation advises transmission without symptoms is possible. Despite this the Dutch government and health authorities stuck to looser quarantine advice than other European countries up to the time of publishing, telling people who had travelled from China, outbreak spots in Italy, and Iran, that they need only self-quarantine if experiencing symptoms. As well as being underpinned by a flawed assumption, the advice relies on people knowing whether they have symptoms or not. This is questionable: Chris Higgins, a GP in Australia, provoked an outcry after treating 70 patients while he had what he thought was the tail end of a mild cold, before he tested positive for Covid-19. It’s also in stark contrast to the approach in the countries most successful at containing the virus, such as Taiwan and Singapore, where authorities drew on their experience of the Sars outbreak to implement strict travel checks and preventative quarantine before even registering a first confirmed case. Individual freedoms The case of the Netherlands shows how a flawed belief about transmission filtered down throughout society, enabling the virus to spread. It also makes for a grand experiment in what happens when a country takes a relaxed approach to the virus, placing the maintenance of normality, personal responsibility and individual freedoms first. The first coronavirus diagnosis in the Netherlands was on February 27th. As authorities traced his contacts, they found he had attended Carnival in the city of Tilburg in the North Brabant region on February 21st-25th. “The patient was not contagious in the days he celebrated the carnival,” the mayor of Tilburg Theo Weterings told media. In the following days, two more people who were at Tilburg carnival were diagnosed with coronavirus. One of them was a worker at Bannink Packaging in Drenthe in the northern Netherlands. His partner was also infected. Related Fintan O’Toole: None of us is safe from virus unless all of us are safe Coronavirus advice: Wash your hands and avoid hugging, kissing and hand shaking Europe risks economic shock similar to financial crisis - Lagarde World View on coronavirus Bannink Packaging continued to operate as normal, saying the employee was not sick when he came to work. “The chance that he has infected colleagues is therefore rather small,” the spokesperson told media. On March 4th, another Bannink Packaging employee – who commuted from Germany – was diagnosed with coronavirus. “In Germany they are a lot stricter with testing . . . We should not exaggerate. Production continues as normal. In that respect, it is business as usual,” a company representative told media. “We advise our employees to stay at home if they have symptoms. We cannot do more.” “What if someone decides to go to work or take an exam? This is their own responsibility” On March 5th a third employee was diagnosed as positive. On March 7th four more people tested positive in Coevorden, where Bannink Packaging is based. That day 900 students of the university society Vindicat returned from a mass ski trip in Piedmont in northern Italy in a convoy of buses to the Netherlands. Amid public concern, authorities met the students and tested four, who were found negative. “Someone who has no symptoms is not contagious,” Jossy van den Boogaard, MD in infectious disease control at local health authority GGD Groningen told media. “Can the students also infect others while they have no symptoms? No,” was the official advice. “What if someone decides to go to work or take an exam? This is their own responsibility.” No panic On March 8th it was announced that a cleaning lady married to a Bannink Packaging employee had tested positive. The director of the school she works at wrote to parents to say there was no reason to panic, and that children could go to school as normal. By this point the outbreak in the carnival region of North Brabant had reached the point that there were shortages of protective equipment for health workers, and people were advised not to call their doctor unless their symptoms were serious. Lawmaker Eva van Esch told parliament a friend of hers had tested positive who had been refused a test for a week after returning from Italy with symptoms. Once positive, the friend had been asked to keep the diagnosis quiet and not to tell her work or contacts, van Esch said. Twelve days after the first diagnosis, confirmed cases of Covid-19 in the Netherlands had risen from 1 to 382 “My party therefore wonders whether this government is actually focusing on preventing the spread of the disease, or whether the health services are primarily concerned with preventing panic,” van Esch said. Dutch testing capacity is limited, forcing authorities to prioritise testing people with a clear link. Roughly 6,000 tests had been done in the Netherlands as of March 7th, national public health institute the RIVM said, a figure that includes double-testing to exclude false positives, and testing for recovery. Twelve days after the first diagnosis, confirmed cases of Covid-19 in the Netherlands had risen from 1 to 382. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/how-dutch-false-sense-of-security-helped-coronavirus-spread-1.4199027?mode=amp
Vlaamse rusthuizen eisen bezoekverbod tot eind deze maand https://www.hln.be/binnenland/vlaamse-rusthuizen-eisen-bezoekverbod-tot-eind-deze-maand~a0a99b74/
Is dat wat hier bejaarden tehuizen zijn? Wat zullen die oudjes eenzaam worden. Maar helaas nodig voor hun eigen veiligheid.
Ja. Ja vind het ook zielig voor die mensen. Erg dat het nodig is maar voor hun veiligheid is het jammer genoeg wel het beste. Misschien skype of Messenger lessen geven. Elke dag even facebellen.